3 ms·

>should court deliberations be confidential? Or should justices be required to post drafts of opinions to the judicial equivalent of GitHub? I think

by tmaly 5y ago

>should court deliberations be confidential? Or should justices be required to post drafts of opinions to the judicial equivalent of GitHub? I think they should. The court has been granted extreme power to decide the nuances of our rights.

cgrealy 4y ago
I'm guessing you mean they should post drafts of opinions to github (your sentence could mean either). I think it's entirely reasonable not to post drafts until they're ready. Hell, even on github, you (generally) don't put up a PR until it's ready for review.
- tmaly 4y ago
  Oh, yeah I see that. I would like to see the whole history of the opinion github style. Would also like to be able to use git blame.

>should court delib­er­a­tions be confi­den­tial? Or should justices be required to post drafts of opin­ions to the judi­cial equiv­a­lent of Git­Hub? I think

>should court delib­er­a­tions be confi­den­tial? Or should justices be required to post drafts of opin­ions to the judi­cial equiv­a­lent of Git­Hub? I think

>should court deliberations be confidential? Or should justices be required to post drafts of opinions to the judicial equivalent of GitHub? I think

>should court deliberations be confidential? Or should justices be required to post drafts of opinions to the judicial equivalent of GitHub? I think