3 ms·
You have misunderstood GP. Alternating functions and regexps looks like this: [\&some_function, qr/some_regex/, \&another_function, qr/another_regex/] Th
by bmn__ 4y ago
You have misunderstood GP.
Alternating functions and regexps looks like this:
[\&some_function, qr/some_regex/, \&another_function, qr/another_regex/]
This is distinct from the idea of sum types.
- SideburnsOfDoom 4y agoOh, I get that their example said _alternating_ function and regex. If that's the real requirement then they shouldn't be _alternating_ in the list at all, there should be a list of (function, regex) tuples. We don't need an example of tuples, they're even more widespread than sum types / unions / enums. So the design as stated is very contrived, to the point where it doesn't make sense, but existing constructs can be used to make sense of it with a change one way or the other.