Any justice that would be the target of the proposed influence campaign knows that the process of deliberation is not decided in the first draft. Moreover, none

Any justice that would be the target of the proposed influence campaign knows that the process of deliberation is not decided in the first draft. Moreover, none of the justices would need to explain their apparent vacillation to the public. None of their power is derived from public opinion, so they are not incentivized to align themselves with public opinion or public pressure. Is leaking this actually likely to influence a ruling in the more conservative direction?