6 ms·
> In sum—I’d suppose it’s a friend, spouse, or family member of a Supreme Court justice who has consistently opposed Roe v. Wade, acting with something betwee
by TameAntelope 4y ago
> In sum—I’d suppose it’s a friend, spouse, or family member of a Supreme Court justice who has consistently opposed Roe v. Wade, acting with something between autonomy and plausible deniability.
So I'm curious if he wrote this with knowledge about what's been going on around Justice Thomas and his wife's behavior [0]. It fits pretty perfectly with that narrative, though is totally bereft of any actual evidence.
[0] https://apnews.com/article/elections-donald-trump-presidential-elections-election-2020-clarence-thomas-4d160eb611e4d6a07053082b301818f8 https://apnews.com/article/elections-donald-trump-presidenti...
- ianferrel 4y agoNear certainty. Someone familiar with the typography of the Supreme Court would definitely also be aware of high visibility current events around it.
- philjohn 4y agoSame as lots of other people writing that it's definitely, 100% a liberal clerk, and even linking to their supposed suspects LinkedIn with 0 evidence?
- mhh__ 4y agoNo one ever learns from the "We did it Reddit" incident.
- tsol 4y agoThe only thing social media loves more than rampant speculation, is mob justice
- the_only_law 4y agoI thought those type of comments were supposed to be flagged to maintain high quality discussion or some nonsense.