> Nobody seems to want to answer the question, which is quite telling actually. You're still missing the very important context of the original comment you rep

> Nobody seems to want to answer the question, which is quite telling actually. You're still missing the very important context of the original comment you replied to, so I'll self-quote: > Arguing these minutae is highly unproductive. It's much better to start from common ground, and a supermajority of Americans believe that the choice should be between patient and doctor. You're ignoring this, and going straight back to debating minutae, and using a completely ludicrous case that (a) nobody wants to be legal and (b) is already totally illegal without any kind of abortion law. > I guess to understand the position I would need to understand what reasoning would justify an abortion at 39 weeks See, you keep claiming that I'm in support of an abortion at 39 weeks. I didn't take that position, did I? Look to Canada, whose Supreme Court ruled that this is a matter between doctor and patient. But, doctors are highly regulated with regards to their behavior and ethics, and gosh, they aren't running around murdering babies like the example you keep trotting out, are they?