3 ms·
"This also rules out smart light switches, as these often need to connect to some kind of cloud, and if that cloud goes down, you could struggle to turn your li
by ars 5y ago
"This also rules out smart light switches, as these often need to connect to some kind of cloud, and if that cloud goes down, you could struggle to turn your lights on."
Hu? No it doesn't. It's a switch, you press it and the light goes on and off, it needs no cloud connection at all. You can automate it if you like, but you don't have to.
And his choice was instead to use a proprietary "Shelly" device that uses WiFi instead? With its own "Shelly cloud"?
I'm sorry, but that was a bad decision.
Get a standard Z-Wave or Zigbee switch, it functions as a real switch, because it's a switch. Then get a Hubitat, which runs entirely locally, and needs no internet unless you want to connect it to Amazon Assistant or Alexa (and you don't have to).
This is future proof, and outage proof - the light switch function as dumb switches, the Hubitat runs entirely locally, with zero internet (not even local internet). And Z-wave or Zigbee are standards and you can interoperate with tons of other devices, so no worry about some manufacturer going out of business.
- Diti 5y agoShelly devices can easily be set up to not use the manufacturer’s cloud, which the author of the article apparently didn’t disable, since he uses their mobile app. When that cloud service is disabled, some more developer-friendly protocols are able to be used, like MQTT, which makes these Shelly devices as future-proof as the other standards you mention, and MQTT libraries and clients are easy to find. The only bad part is that the manufacturer’s firmware for Shelly products does not support TLS; it is possible to flash other firmwares which do not have this limitation (Tasmota). (I have a bad experience with Shelly devices, but they made me love MQTT.)