I mean, it’s fine if you want to live somewhere rural, but why should that be subsidized? I mean, it's fine if you want to live somewhere urban, but why

I mean, it’s fine if you want to live somewhere rural, but why should that be subsidized? I mean, it's fine if you want to live somewhere urban, but why should that be subsidized? I don't think we should necessarily subsidize more heavily for folks who want to live rural, but many want/need to. Of course we should subsidize schools, utilities, and other human rights for them just like we do for urban areas. I'm also not convinced rural areas are more expensive to subsidize. Clearly many things are more expensive in rural areas, but also many things are more expensive in cities. That's a complicated equation to put it mildly.