I read it in a different way, where we’d go from “plays chess like a bad human” to “plays chess superhumanly”, applied to general knowledge synthesis tasks — so

I read it in a different way, where we’d go from “plays chess like a bad human” to “plays chess superhumanly”, applied to general knowledge synthesis tasks — something that would be a rapid change once it was able to synthesize general knowledge answers. Upon reflection, my comment was too critical for having a different read than you did.