3 ms·
To the point in your last sentence, a few years ago I worked at a software company where there was a prolific code writer who similarly tied up about ~2 SWEs cl
by phaedrus 4y ago
To the point in your last sentence, a few years ago I worked at a software company where there was a prolific code writer who similarly tied up about ~2 SWEs cleaning up his messes. He was a Perl programmer who was set loose on C# code. The broken ways the company tracked productivity meant the prolific writer rated as doing great while the three SWEs who had to spend 2/3rds of their time fixing the messes he left behind were rated as unproductive.
- winterplace 4y agoHow did the company track productivity? Why did the one get rated as doing great?
- panda88888 4y agoProbably lines of new code?
- sp332 4y agoFeatures checked off as "working" when they pass a test/demo instead of passing code review?