3 ms·
They either always have some critical piece of functionality missing, or require much more configuration and hand holding than Heroku does. That's not to say th
by ryanSrich 4y ago
They either always have some critical piece of functionality missing, or require much more configuration and hand holding than Heroku does. That's not to say they aren't useful, but for serious businesses it's hard to migrate without assuming you'll need a DevOps person to run it. Heroku on the other hand is so hands off, that you really don't need anyone specifically to manage it. We spend about $1,000/month for Heroku managing a SaaS app with 40,000 users and I have never had to tweak or configure Heroku beyond initial setup and then just scaling, which is literally just clicking a button.
- dimgl 4y agoI think you're seriously underestimating Heroku's competition here.
- ryanSrich 4y agoI'd actually love to be proven wrong here. I don't want to stay on Heroku, but I also don't see other viable options. My requirements are such that I cannot have a dedicated Cloud Engineer or DevOps person, and in reality, I want to spend 0 hours per week thinking about my cloud infrastructure. Heroku allows me to do that.