3 ms·

Sorry for the rant, I am sure people will downvote me, but this has to get out now: Why does it has to have those ugly buttons in the front? If you watch the

Sorry for the rant, I am sure people will downvote me, but this has to get out now: Why does it has to have those ugly buttons in the front? If you watch the introduction keynote of the iPhone, you' ll see that the entire point of the big-screen-smartphones was to get rid of all those confusing buttons and let the screen handle any input possibilites that are valid to the current context. I dont care whether it has a better camera, a faster CPU and all of those things, if you force me to look at those ugly buttons every time I hold this thing in my hands, the clear winner (for me) will always be the more minimalistic device, which is the iPhone in my humble opinion.

saturdaysaint 15y ago
It's hard to tell, but I think those are actually software buttons (I think it's been clearer in other screenshots, and it makes sense since this is exactly how Honeycomb tablets work/look). So it's arguably more minimalistic than the iPhone (all screen!) but also arguably more difficult to use without looking at the device.
angryasian 15y ago
if they are software buttons, i have no doubt they will be customizable. The buttons are incredibly useful. The back button in Android is incredibly convenient. In ios you click on a link from an app, launches the browser now you have to figure out how to go back. Either hold down the home button or as I see a lot of people, go back to dashboard and launch app again. On android a things are able to be shared between apps. Example I take a picture, I can send it right away to dropbox, photoshop.. do what I need to do and press the back button. The menu button is always consistent, no need to try to figure on an app by app basis. This is preferable for myself at least.