> "In short, it will lead to privileges deciding who can work for Apple, not who’d be the best fit." Doesn't forcing people to work with home lead to this more

> "In short, it will lead to privileges deciding who can work for Apple, not who’d be the best fit." Doesn't forcing people to work with home lead to this more? Not everyone has an available, suitable work space at home, and those who don't or who have noisy families etc (generally less white, male, etc etc) are likely to miss opportunities they could have taken in an office. Making this a social justice issue is a weird, speculative way to deal with this. Why bring gender and race into it, why not just argue the merits (which do seem to be in favour of remote work). Seems a silly letter to me.