4 ms·
Well, subaddressing is actually part of an RFC [1], so no, they won't. 1: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5233 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/r
by dempedempe 4y ago
Well, subaddressing is actually part of an RFC [1], so no, they won't.
1: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5233 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5233
- karmanyaahm 4y agoI don't think people who make money from selling email addresses care about RFCs
- DistractionRect 4y agoLowes and plenty of other sites already forbid plus addressing.
- scintill76 4y agoNOTE: Because the encoding of detailed addresses are site and/or implementation specific `+` or any other encoding is not part of an RFC, and I don't think the existence of subaddressing is either.