>You were able to "get away" with implementing a pretty bare bone thing, but you called it out as something that should be viable in general. I can see how you

>You were able to "get away" with implementing a pretty bare bone thing, but you called it out as something that should be viable in general. I can see how you had this impression from the language of the blog post, but what I meant to express is that the approach generalizes, even if this specific code does not. >The web is full of those (response and request headers, query string parameters), data formats (JSON is basically a hashtable plus some fancy pieces) , caches (that are just hash tables), etc. The web generally falls well outside of the target use-cases for Hare.