3 ms·
Sorry, but I can't agree with the take that Hare doesn't include the progress over the last 4 decades. Sure, it doesn't include every new development, but that'
by turminal 4y ago
Sorry, but I can't agree with the take that Hare doesn't include the progress over the last 4 decades. Sure, it doesn't include every new development, but that's impossible anyway unless you're fine with being a kitchen sink language.
- nynx 4y agoIt is great that Hare has tagged unions and non-nullable types, but polymorphism has been a huge part of language advancement.