> Help me understand what protections against warrantless “searches and seizures” has to do with the State regulating medical procedures? I'm sorry, you have t

> Help me understand what protections against warrantless “searches and seizures” has to do with the State regulating medical procedures? I'm sorry, you have to read the first 11 words of the Amendment: The right of the people to be secure in their persons > Which says: “No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner.” I’m at a loss. You understand the Constitution is a legal document, right? Not a sequence of metaphors and allegories? Is a fetus a “soldier?” No? Then the Third Amendment is irrelevant. I said the spirit of a right of abortion lives in this amendment. If the government bans abortions, this is precisely the same thing as effectively nationalizing fetuses and quartering them in bodies, yes, but also in houses, as those bodies live in houses. The point is consent... if a woman does not consent to a pregnancy... You really have to try very very hard not to see it. Well done.