4 ms·
It's so ugly it hurts. And I didn't notice any snappiness.
by tut-urut-utut 4y ago
It's so ugly it hurts. And I didn't notice any snappiness.
- mccorrinall 4y agoVery snappy on my phone. However, it does not have a login button, so when autofilling my login, I have to touch an input field and press enter on the keyboard
- savolai 4y agoThe login button is the triangle on the right side of password field. Agreed, confusing.
- mccorrinall 4y agoOh, thanks. I think I didn’t see it, because inline buttons in the password field are usually to mask/unmask the password and a login button is usually placed below the form.
- 8organicbits 4y agoRelative to gmail, I don't agree. The last time I loaded gmail in the web it took 30 seconds to load and the UI was full of so many non-mail related icons and things. I usually give up and load HTML view. I saw ~1 second load time and <1 second to change views. For UI I like the minimalism. Although I won't use this, I want better native mail browsers, not web clients. What load times are others seeing?
- andylynch 4y agoHaving used gmail since its closed beta I’m bemused that it’s now consistently slower to load a new gmail tab than to cold start Outlook for the same account.