4 ms·
Rep.licants.org
- joebadmo 15y agoInteresting. It reminds me of human-computer chess teams, a continuation of computer-augmented humanity. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human-computer_chess_matches http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human-computer_chess_matches
- asto 15y agoIf the bot posts (legally) objectionable material, I'm guessing it's not the bot that goes to jail.
- theDoug 15y agoIt's a good strawman, but I wonder where the bots would somehow go to collect and then somehow post such material.
- alexhaefner 15y agoYeah very true. I also kind of fail to see the utility of the bot beyond a whimsical demo. And there doesn't appear to be much of a real demonstration of it's benefit.
- deleted 15y ago[deleted]
- obeattie 15y agoTwo words: Turing test.
- wylie 15y agoIt already fooled a friend of mine with a tweet at him. But if it were a human I would think it has incredibly bad taste in articles.
- legec 15y agoThis comment has been posted by a human being. There will be cake.
- stephenyoung 15y agotwo minutes in, it tried to re-open a dead conversation from a week ago and argue with the other twitter user.
- codezero 15y agoStarting a pointless argument on the Internet? Sounds like it's doing a smashing job at mimicking the average Internet user. It could get worse if it uses YouTube comments as a training set!
- rmason 15y agoSo if my bot gets me a date with a girl, can I bring it along? Why not? What happens when she finds out that I don't speak fluent Farsi? This has to be one of the creepiest things I've seen in twenty plus years on the net. Just because something is possible to build doesn't mean that you should.
- mikecane 15y agoI set up an acct on Twitter with a bot. How long before it starts tweeting anything? And can the activity level be changed?