3 ms·
No, the risks is not clear from foreign experience alone: https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry/article/abortion-and-mental
by encryptluks2 5y ago
No, the risks is not clear from foreign experience alone:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-british-journal-of-psychiatry/article/abortion-and-mental-health-quantitative-synthesis-and-analysis-of-research-published-19952009/E8D556AAE1C1D2F0F8B060B28BEE6C3D https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/the-british-journal-...
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6207970/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6207970/
- olsonjeffery 5y agoStill failing to refute the central point: more harm is minimized by preventing an unwanted birth via abortion than via “caring about their mental health.” Rhetorically, everyone recognizes that you’re just moving the goalposts by providing one onerous requirement after another.
- encryptluks2 5y agoThat isn't my point here. The point is the critical need for mental health services to help some women deal with having an at-home abortion. It can be trauma inducing for some women. You can't pretend it simply doesn't exist when studies clearly indicate otherwise and then simultaneously say others are shifting the goal posts when you are doing just that.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]