So what? They may be coming from a politicized angle, and probably only passing facts that support their case, but at least they are facts, and not misinformati

So what? They may be coming from a politicized angle, and probably only passing facts that support their case, but at least they are facts, and not misinformation, like graphene in vaccines or whatever. Everyone is coming from some bias and angle, so don't judge on that. Judge on the veracity of the statements. Do you have anything to say about the actual statements? Most everything that is wrong with modern discourse is due to ad hominem and labeling rather than discussion of facts.