The fact that someone could have a conversation publicly available, and reference the guidelines they are applying in partisan is baffling. I almost suspect sat

The fact that someone could have a conversation publicly available, and reference the guidelines they are applying in partisan is baffling. I almost suspect satire. I would give yourself a second of self-reflection. You are the first and only violator of the guidelines: You: “this is a lazy comment - I believe it was in conjunction with another new york artist who's studio is in the same building - Tom Sachs - he's an installation artist - and the brick was $30 - not accounting for taste huh- never the less - your point is extremely poorly made -“ The guidelines: Be kind. Don't be snarky. Have curious conversation; don't cross-examine. Please don't fulminate. Please don't sneer, including at the rest of the community You: "looking at your history of comments- you might consider acquainting yourself with the guidelines” The guidelines: Eschew flamebait. Avoid unrelated controversies and generic tangents. You: “good thing I was here to remind you before you get in trouble for intellectual dishonestly” The guidelines: Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.