Yes! Exactly. How is it different than if you killed the child right after it was delivered? Or how about a couple of years later while it was physically and se

Yes! Exactly. How is it different than if you killed the child right after it was delivered? Or how about a couple of years later while it was physically and sexually abused in foster care because the mother had to give the child to the state. Or maybe the mother tried to do good by the child and kept it but it became such a burden that she was unable to continue her education and she ended up in a less than ideal situation and the child became malnourished and died or the mother fell into drugs as an escape and the mother made less than good decisions leading to the child's death. Or maybe the mother busted her ass but because of continuous cutbacks by the GOP was unable to get the assistance she needed to get out of the projects and that child fell in with the wrong crowd, joined a gang, and ended up killing a number of other people? If you're "pro-life" then you have then you have to support the life post birth as well. Pro-choice reduces deaths through safe abortions. Pro-choice reduces deaths by not bringing babies into the world that their parents and social welfare programs, that the right continue to kill, can't support. If you're going to be hyperbolic with "liberals wanting to kill babies" then I'm going to be hyperbolic with "The right want to kill babies, children, toddlers, and their parents and make their life a living hell until their demise comes"