2 ms·

Yeah because that has zero psychological implications and always goes well. How about letting the person doing the work decide.

• meerita 5y ago
  Yeah, because killing your own son/daughter will bring zero psychological implications.
  • micromacrofoot 5y ago
    Seems like we’ve encountered a recursion error, I’ll say it again: let the person doing the work decide.
    • meerita 5y ago
      Imagine I invite you to a trip in my private jet. We're going to London, and when we're on the middle of the trip, I decide you're no longer welcome on my property. So I open the door the plane and drop you off of the plane. Most people will agree that is unfair, the ideal would be landing and then you move on, but i killed you just because i did the work deciding what was good for me, by convinience. That's your argument.
      • micromacrofoot 5y ago
        My argument is that your body is a private jet? believe me if that were the case I’d jump out willingly :) we will never see eye-to-eye on this on an ideological level, which I think exemplifies the importance of it being a personal choice!
      • webmaven 5y ago
        > Imagine I invite you to a trip in my private jet. To extend your metaphor a bit, what if you didn't invite me aboard, and I'm a stowaway? Or a hijacker who wants to divert the plane to a different destination? What if my presence isn't merely inconvenient, but actually hazardous?