4 ms·
This is a straw-man. The problem is not that Google is designing their services to cater to the average tech-illiterate user, it's that they're preventing the t
by throw10920 5y ago
This is a straw-man. The problem is not that Google is designing their services to cater to the average tech-illiterate user, it's that they're preventing the tech-literate users from opting out of phone recovery and/or using something more sane, like what's been listed above.
That's clearly malice. Like, there's no good reason that Google would require you to hand over a phone number.
- TheDong 5y ago> That's clearly malice. Like, there's no good reason that Google would require you to hand over a phone number. Let me give you a reasonable non-malicious reason: Googler A: "We have this new attack. People are creating accounts from compromised IPs, and then creating app passwords to send huge amounts of gmail spam through SMTP directly, thus avoiding our browser-based spam mechanisms" Googler B: "Can we ban them?" A: "We can't ban them because we have no info on them, just sign-up IP, and the botnet has practically unlimited IPs" B: "What about forcing them to have a phone number so we can do anti-spam on that, and perma-ban compromised phone numbers from making new accounts?" A: "Good idea, that'll stop such a huge quantity of phishing emails and spam. That'll be good for the internet as a whole" ---- See, a non-malicious explanation.