Well you see, because of a vague statement buried deep within a EULA, obfuscated with legal jargon, those people aren't being "spied on" - they are "knowingly a

Well you see, because of a vague statement buried deep within a EULA, obfuscated with legal jargon, those people aren't being "spied on" - they are "knowingly and voluntarily sharing their data". And since more and more commercial activity is gated behind agreeing to one-sided, impenetrable legal tomes, what used to be felonies are now just a cost of living in modern society. Don't like it? Go live in the woods. What you should not do is lobby for placing strict limits to contracts of adhesion (or even all contracts).