3 ms·

Slashdot---Digg---Reddit---Slashdot is the more likely scenario. The quality of Digg is so low only 17 year old gamers enjoy the site now. Reddit is followin

• bootload 19y ago
  "... I don't see these sort of user driven news aggregation sites have legs ..." In what way? Slashdot is 10 years old so you can create a business from '(tech) news aggregation'. "... How do they not end up going the way of Kro5hin after 2-3 years? ..." My stab at it is the further you go mainstream, the more general the majority of topics & information. Could the solution to this be trying to stay to the low-amplitude end of the long tail ( http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Long_Tail http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Long_Tail ) of possible submissions (finding, encouraging posts from obscure original articles, posts) and trying to avoid the popular aggregated posts or high-amplitude (mainstream media searches for stories, add a bit of commentary + add) you see in the mainstream? The real value for readers (in my opinion) is in the access to variety of information. Low amplitude is equals greater diversity of information.
  • tr02 19y ago
    User driven in the sense the users are the editors. Slashdot is still interesting because the slashdot editors have maintained strict editorial control over the front page. I agree the user-as-editors can work for niche subjects. The programming subreddit is an example.