> I don't want to devolve into any petty arguments about what makes a Lisp a "Lisp", Very much agree! I shouldn't have framed it that way. I should have said:

> I don't want to devolve into any petty arguments about what makes a Lisp a "Lisp", Very much agree! I shouldn't have framed it that way. I should have said: each time you make a hybrid language between approaches, there are new people who will try it out and may discover a new and exciting way to program. Some people, in hindsight, will certainly wish they had jumped further - but they can always do that in the future and some will only make the bigger jump after making a smaller one.