2 ms·
I have my own VPN on a digitalocean droplet and it’s basically the same, I’m outright blocked from many sites (Imgur for example) and I have to solve tons of ca
by drexlspivey 5y ago
I have my own VPN on a digitalocean droplet and it’s basically the same, I’m outright blocked from many sites (Imgur for example) and I have to solve tons of captchas. DigitalOcean doesnt accept cash so your argument doesn’t pass the sniff test.
- jcrawfordor 5y agoDO has a generally poor reputation in the security industry as abuse from their services is very common - they don't really vet their customers to any real degree. The same is true of e.g. AWS which is why a lot of websites will outright block traffic coming from AWS. The reality is that "anonymous payment" is kind of pointless, it's basically never the payment method that determines abuse potential as abusers have all kinds of ways of making payment anonymously even when only e.g. cc is accepted. What matters is the level of time and effort put into monitoring usage. To be honest, on a pure sniff test your traffic coming from DO is probably more suspicious. There are lots of legitimate uses of commercial VPNs. There are not many legitimate users of consumer web-browsing from DO.
- jacooper 5y agoI think this is different. You are banned because DO IP ranges are public and everyone wants to ban cloud IPs, since legit users don't use static VPS IPs. I am currently hosting head scale with an exit node on hetzner, and sometimes i am banned from websites. But back when I used contabo it was a rareity to get blocked, even though its a more "shady" host, maybe because its not as well known ?