3 ms·

And they'd just as likely uphold a Federal protection of abortion if an upcoming Democrat Congress and White House passed one. What's your point?

ceejayoz 5y ago
Why would you think this court makeup would uphold a Federal abortion protection? They largely won’t even uphold the VRA.
- xyzzyz 5y ago
  How did this court makeup rule in the Bostock case?
  - ceejayoz 5y ago
    This court didn’t, unless I missed some news about Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s miraculous resurrection.
    - rayiner 5y ago
      Bostock was 6-3, with Gorsuch and Robert’s joining the majority. Even swapping RBG for Barret, Bostock still would have come out the same way. Also note that only Alito and Thomas wrote in criticism of Obergefell to concur in the denial of cert for the Kim Davis case. I know you think conservatives are just as results oriented as liberals, but that’s not true. No liberal Justice will ever go wobbly on a liberal social issue. It’s always a conservative justice that breaks the party line on cases like Bostock (O’Conner, Kennedy, Roberts, and now Gorsuch). Roe is uniquely at risk because it embraces the liberal notion of Supreme Court as national moral tribunal in its purest form. Even liberals struggle to defend the decision on its on merits. Tim Carney has collected an entire list of quotes from prominent liberal academics criticizing Roe https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/restoring-america/equality-not-elitism/there-is-no-valid-defense-of-roe-thats-why-that-side-resorts-to-threats https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/restori... > One of the most curious things about Roe is that, behind its own verbal smokescreen, the substantive judgment on which it rests is nowhere to be found.” That's liberal legal scholar Laurence Tribe. Decisions like Oberrgefell and Bostock are on far firmer legal footing.

ceejayoz 5y ago

Why would you think this court makeup would uphold a Federal abortion protection? They largely won’t even uphold the VRA.

xyzzyz 5y ago
How did this court makeup rule in the Bostock case?
- ceejayoz 5y ago
  This court didn’t, unless I missed some news about Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s miraculous resurrection.
  - rayiner 5y ago
    Bostock was 6-3, with Gorsuch and Robert’s joining the majority. Even swapping RBG for Barret, Bostock still would have come out the same way. Also note that only Alito and Thomas wrote in criticism of Obergefell to concur in the denial of cert for the Kim Davis case. I know you think conservatives are just as results oriented as liberals, but that’s not true. No liberal Justice will ever go wobbly on a liberal social issue. It’s always a conservative justice that breaks the party line on cases like Bostock (O’Conner, Kennedy, Roberts, and now Gorsuch). Roe is uniquely at risk because it embraces the liberal notion of Supreme Court as national moral tribunal in its purest form. Even liberals struggle to defend the decision on its on merits. Tim Carney has collected an entire list of quotes from prominent liberal academics criticizing Roe https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/restoring-america/equality-not-elitism/there-is-no-valid-defense-of-roe-thats-why-that-side-resorts-to-threats https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/restoring-america/restori... > One of the most curious things about Roe is that, behind its own verbal smokescreen, the substantive judgment on which it rests is nowhere to be found.” That's liberal legal scholar Laurence Tribe. Decisions like Oberrgefell and Bostock are on far firmer legal footing.