3 ms·
I meant both chatting with a friend or reading a science work / whitepaper. You gave me a brilliant answer to former. What about whitepapers, considering of wh
by eimrine 5y ago
I meant both chatting with a friend or reading a science work / whitepaper. You gave me a brilliant answer to former.
What about whitepapers, considering of which to believe and which to disagree for me is something that shapes me (my field is cryptocurrencies, if thah matters). But I don't want just a second part of answer, my desire is to find the answer in general, applicable to anything: from math to jurisprudence.
- jfengel 5y agoMy best suggestion is to find as many reasonable people as you can and discuss it with them. (With a focus on "discuss" rather than "argue".) I don't think you can ever get completely outside your own limitations, except perhaps in trivial cases. Everything is constrained by your own subjectivity. But inter-subjectivity reduces the chance that you're objectively wrong. I believe that's the best you can hope for.