3 ms·
If you're following the advice of the post, and using HTML as your authoring format, this is pretty common. I do it a lot on my blog. It's similar to how often
by jefftk 5y ago
If you're following the advice of the post, and using HTML as your authoring format, this is pretty common. I do it a lot on my blog.
It's similar to how often you see tables in Markdown.
- rchaud 5y agoEven the official Markdown guide suggests using a table generator because the markup is a hassle: https://www.markdownguide.org/extended-syntax/ https://www.markdownguide.org/extended-syntax/ HTML tables are similarly cumbersome, with or without closing tags. If you have a table of static information to fill in, copy/pasting from Excel into a HTML table generator and pasting the output is signficantly faster.
- jefftk 5y agoMarkdown is suggesting using a generator for writing, but you were saying it was unlikely that someone would be reading a table in source. I'd also much rather write an HTML table by hand than a markdown one.