>Only security thing they point out is USB access for the modem.. And the pointless supply chain vulnerability, introduced in order to game the FSF certificati

>Only security thing they point out is USB access for the modem.. And the pointless supply chain vulnerability, introduced in order to game the FSF certification process, and lying about security features in their competitors, and accusing them of using binary blobs which they actually do as well while doing so with a worse security implementation. >you can fix that quite easily with a bunch of udev rules, I guess Exactly, why didn't they? I would understand if some of those were just teething troubles but that phone came out well over a year ago and bear in mind this analysis and criticism comes from within the OSS community trying to help them get this fixed, and hitting a brick wall.