3 ms·
No because they use the same argument, the child is bigger than "you", or us, it is against the religion that is above "all of us".
by chucksta 4y ago
No because they use the same argument, the child is bigger than "you", or us, it is against the religion that is above "all of us".
- 411111111111111 4y agoYou're the first person I ever heard use that argument. It's usually about the life of the potential child, not about society at all. I'm not sure I get the argument either. Is the danger that God grabs his ban hammer and stomps western society because a woman living as part of that society decided to end a pregnancy? Fwiw: I was against a vaccination requirement for COVID-19, but categorically denying that it might be necessary for another virus is a very dangerous worldview. It's not necessarily a choice an individual can do, because herd immunity is a thing and vaccinations usually don't make you immune to a virus, it usually just improves the odds your immune system has against it.
- chucksta 4y agoIts not exactly a literal statement. Murder in the general sense is bad for society no? The people that use the phrase murdering a baby, think they are stopping it for the betterment of mankind. It's the same logic that makes people push religion. They think you and the world will be better for it. Its certainly not my argument >Is the danger that God grabs his ban hammer and stomps western society because a woman living as part of that society decided to end a pregnancy? Being scared of the ban hammer is history for the last 300 years of Catholicism.