> You certainly lay out a possible case, but I don't think they available information warrants such confidence (especially naming a specific person) That's abs

> You certainly lay out a possible case, but I don't think they available information warrants such confidence (especially naming a specific person) That's absolutely true, that part is just speculation. (and FWIW, it's not my theory either, I just paraphrased the social media chatter) But my point is that the number of candidates is limited. (and I disagree with you about the plausibility of a Republican leak, given that it was leaked to Politico)