3 ms·
You can make the broader point that governments ought to be invested in protecting human life regardless if that human is officially a citizen or not. We are no
by bruhvinston 4y ago
You can make the broader point that governments ought to be invested in protecting human life regardless if that human is officially a citizen or not.
We are not allowed to kill tourists or other travellers.
Presumably governments can take away your citizenship, and it has been done before, but I think this shouldn't be a de facto license to kill.
I suppose secular people would argue that it is forbidden to kill them without appealing to their soul. And a secular pro-life argument would most likely revolve around the usual justification for why we don't kill other humans.
- TulliusCicero 4y agoI'm agnostic and currently neutral on the abortion question. Both sides have good points, neither side is completely convincing. I do want people to have autonomy over their bodies, and the extent to which a fetus can be considered a separate person seems like an unsolvable philosophical question to me.