2 ms·

I think it’s simpler from an implementation standpoint, that’s the only simplicity it brings to the table. Among other things, it does not require any new synt

I think it’s simpler from an implementation standpoint, that’s the only simplicity it brings to the table. Among other things, it does not require any new syntax.

masklinn 5y ago
> Among other things, it does not require any new syntax. Which was added anyway, because Javascript got constructors (and `new`) to match Java,