> The same “states’ rights” used to subjugate black people with chattel slavery States' rights is in the Constitution: the Tenth Amendment. And there is anothe

> The same “states’ rights” used to subjugate black people with chattel slavery States' rights is in the Constitution: the Tenth Amendment. And there is another amendment that abolished slavery, so we fixed the issue that you are talking about here. But that fix did not abolish states' rights. It still leaves things to the states that should be left to the states. > should now be repurposed to subjugate women by robbing them of bodily autonomy. I already explained why this is nonsense. > You may believe abortion is murder but that’s a completely arbitrary and, more importantly, a religious doctrine. Not everyone who believes abortion is murder believes that on religious grounds. There are valid non-religious grounds for considering a fetus, or at least a fetus after 15 weeks, which is the deadline in the law under review, to be a person, at least to a sufficient extent that aborting it would be murder. (The brief for petitioners in this case describes some of them.) You might not agree with them, but that doesn't make them "arbitrary".