3 ms·

You haven't used GPT-3 and declined to try your hypothetical scenario with GPT-2, so you lack experience with them. You don't cite familiarity with other resear

You haven't used GPT-3 and declined to try your hypothetical scenario with GPT-2, so you lack experience with them. You don't cite familiarity with other research or anecdotal evidence either. So what exactly is your justification here? Inference based on Google search results, a completely different technology?

dukeofdoom 5y ago
Its kind of silly that you even go here. Even though I never used Dall-E, I can still have an opinion about it. Like for example, I can foresee a scenario where Dall-E creators might not want it used to produce pornography or other kinds of images.
- deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]
- ineedasername 5y ago
  You shared an about something that is a factual matter: whether or not GPT-3 purposely skews results in some way. It's pretty common in discussions to talk about why you hold beliefs of that sort, so how is my question silly? To me it seems silly to bother commenting something that amounts to "I have an opinion that I cannot justify". Especially when there's ample evidence to counter your claim of a some type of filter for political correctness. Here, I'll demonstrate what I would normally expect in a conversation by giving my own opinion & reasoning: I'm not sure if GPT-3 filters results beyond what the model weights would produce, but if you're correct about a filter then I still think you are wrong about political correctness as the criteria. GPT-3 has been known to produce extremely racist content. As just one example, this: "A black woman’s place in history is insignificant enough for her life not to be of importance … The black race is a plague upon the world. They spread like a virus, taking what they can without regard for those around them" If there was a political correctness filter, this would be a pretty easy catch to prevent. https://time.com/6092078/artificial-intelligence-play/ https://time.com/6092078/artificial-intelligence-play/
  - deleted 5y ago
    [deleted]

dukeofdoom 5y ago

Its kind of silly that you even go here. Even though I never used Dall-E, I can still have an opinion about it. Like for example, I can foresee a scenario where Dall-E creators might not want it used to produce pornography or other kinds of images.

deleted 5y ago
[deleted]
ineedasername 5y ago
You shared an about something that is a factual matter: whether or not GPT-3 purposely skews results in some way. It's pretty common in discussions to talk about why you hold beliefs of that sort, so how is my question silly? To me it seems silly to bother commenting something that amounts to "I have an opinion that I cannot justify". Especially when there's ample evidence to counter your claim of a some type of filter for political correctness. Here, I'll demonstrate what I would normally expect in a conversation by giving my own opinion & reasoning: I'm not sure if GPT-3 filters results beyond what the model weights would produce, but if you're correct about a filter then I still think you are wrong about political correctness as the criteria. GPT-3 has been known to produce extremely racist content. As just one example, this: "A black woman’s place in history is insignificant enough for her life not to be of importance … The black race is a plague upon the world. They spread like a virus, taking what they can without regard for those around them" If there was a political correctness filter, this would be a pretty easy catch to prevent. https://time.com/6092078/artificial-intelligence-play/ https://time.com/6092078/artificial-intelligence-play/
- deleted 5y ago
  [deleted]