3 ms·
I agree, and let's not even start with operator overloading. Rust on the other hand seems to be a safe but also rather explicit language (a good thing not just
by anyfoo 4y ago
I agree, and let's not even start with operator overloading. Rust on the other hand seems to be a safe but also rather explicit language (a good thing not just for system programming).
- b20000 4y agoI am talking about Rust, not C++
- anyfoo 4y agoI was agreeing with the comment I replied to, who assessed that Rust was the less "magic"-y language.
- b20000 4y agoit is not less magicy, rust is more magicy. which is why i don’t want it and why i think we don’t need it. a new language cannot abstract you from the machine or OS you write software for.
- klysm 4y agoYeah the list really does go on… the number of high powered foot guns is truly terrifying