> Many of the perceived failures of DALL-E 2 are subjective and ambiguous Could you expand on this a bit? DALL-E provides graphical, interpretive, output meant

> Many of the perceived failures of DALL-E 2 are subjective and ambiguous Could you expand on this a bit? DALL-E provides graphical, interpretive, output meant for humans. Isn't that necessarily subjective? Any qualitative metric of DALL-E 2 will need to involve some aggregate of humans being subjective. The papers title is "A very preliminary analysis of DALL-E 2", so low data points/opinions/speculation/further questions should be expected.