> > • Many large functions – 200 functions exceeded 75 lines of non-comment code [NASA App. A p. 23] > Large functions with no comments? I don't think that's

> > • Many large functions – 200 functions exceeded 75 lines of non-comment code [NASA App. A p. 23] > Large functions with no comments? I don't think that's what the citation says. It says the functions had more than 75 lines of code not counting any comments. It doesn't say there were no comments in these functions. Nitpick aside, I'm sure we can all agree that a large number of such lengthy functions is not good practice.