3 ms·

What are your plans for dealing with people who do not wish to have a third-party commenting layer they have no moderation power in forced upon them, and for th

What are your plans for dealing with people who do not wish to have a third-party commenting layer they have no moderation power in forced upon them, and for the problem of a “let’s find weird people and mock them until they are on the verge of suicide” community like LJDrama/Something Awful/4Chan/Kiwifarms/etc starting to use Kontxt? This is a problem that every “we made a comments layer for the entire web!” project has faced.

dbodin11 5y ago
There will always be a delicate line to be addressed between free speech and moderation / censorship. There's a web layer, but pieces can also be extracted and shared in groups and feed in the app. There is an option for publishers / site owners to natively add Kontxt directly to their site with a single line of javascript to give them an initial point of control and moderation (view only, comment, or user added highlights). However, sites can have multiple highlight layers with different privacy controls, so users can switch to another layer for discussion for something like research. Privacy controlled layers are only accessible to those they're shared with and there's only one public layer per site. Laws will always be followed. And cruel behavior on the web will likely be addressed as it is elsewhere today. It's too early to have developed any firm policies around, but it's definitely important and will be watched and addressed as needed.
- egypturnash 5y ago
  Is there an opt-out option for publishers and site owners?
  - dbodin11 5y ago
    Not at the moment. But I'll keep that in mind as things progress.
true_religion 5y ago
I feel like problems of harassment and organized mobs should be solved by government action. We can self police for politeness, and keeping people on topic but the moment people start using a venue to organize harassment, the victim and venue owner ought to be able to rely on a higher party to adjudicate justice.

dbodin11 5y ago

There will always be a delicate line to be addressed between free speech and moderation / censorship. There's a web layer, but pieces can also be extracted and shared in groups and feed in the app. There is an option for publishers / site owners to natively add Kontxt directly to their site with a single line of javascript to give them an initial point of control and moderation (view only, comment, or user added highlights). However, sites can have multiple highlight layers with different privacy controls, so users can switch to another layer for discussion for something like research. Privacy controlled layers are only accessible to those they're shared with and there's only one public layer per site. Laws will always be followed. And cruel behavior on the web will likely be addressed as it is elsewhere today. It's too early to have developed any firm policies around, but it's definitely important and will be watched and addressed as needed.

egypturnash 5y ago
Is there an opt-out option for publishers and site owners?
- dbodin11 5y ago
  Not at the moment. But I'll keep that in mind as things progress.

true_religion 5y ago

I feel like problems of harassment and organized mobs should be solved by government action. We can self police for politeness, and keeping people on topic but the moment people start using a venue to organize harassment, the victim and venue owner ought to be able to rely on a higher party to adjudicate justice.