4 ms·
It's refreshing to at least see them admit their lunacy here! Scientific incentives are so insanely wrong that it's hard not to see everything not directly sup
by exmadscientist 4y ago
It's refreshing to at least see them admit their lunacy here!
Scientific incentives are so insanely wrong that it's hard not to see everything not directly supporting an immediate application flaming out within the next 50-100 years (assuming no major course corrections).
I'd probably still be a scientist if things were better. But they're not.
Incidentally, this is why the science worship/science fetishism is so cringe-inducing for those of us who've been down at the coal face (ok, for me it was the iron face in Soudan, but whatever). The process, capital-S Science, is worthy. What we have now is not that.
- MattGaiser 4y agoIncentives in general are insanely bad in most places if we honestly looked at it. It is so very difficult to get anything long term done anywhere.