NASA looked at it well before the analysis mentioned in the slide deck, and it was a much shorter analysis and simply did not find this flaw. Toyota had their o

NASA looked at it well before the analysis mentioned in the slide deck, and it was a much shorter analysis and simply did not find this flaw. Toyota had their own technical experts and plenty of opportunity to publish technical reports rebutting it. I am not aware of any place where they did so, and they certainly had the opportunity (nobody is muzzling them.) I believe that maybe Toyota did argue that there was no evidence that this flaw caused the actual events in the field, which is true but also not a rebuttal exactly.