3 ms·
Looks like an impressive tool that makes a previously hard but useful process an order of magnitude more approachable. With waldo.io and Checkly It joins the l
by kall 4y ago
Looks like an impressive tool that makes a previously hard but useful process an order of magnitude more approachable.
With waldo.io and Checkly It joins the list of QA force multipliers that would make my life, as the sole developer in a bootstrapped startup trying to punch above it's weight, much easier. First, they give me a taste with a free plan, then hit me with production pricing we still can't justify.
If I have this right, 20 sessions is just a trial and 1000 sessions is very careful use.
If these scenarios are so easy to create, I would imagine you would make something like 50 (?), run them against every deploy (10 a day?). That's 15.000 replays, right?
So the 100$ plan is something like 10 scenarios at 3 deploys a day. That sounds too scaled back to get good use out of it. Or do I have the wrong idea about the intended use case?
I get it though: they all have reasonable pricing for a unique service that provides real, obvious value AND may actually be expensive to run. I'm just a little sad about not getting to use them.
- Gabriel_h 4y agoThanks so much for this feedback here. You have exactly the right idea for the use case, and so we might need to scale up our replay thresholds here.
- kall 4y agoFor pricing that is both "small fish" friendly and not too cheap, I like what Vercel is doing, where the smallest paid plan is basically a discount package on the pay-as-you-go pricing beyond that, especially if you use just one seat.
- Gabriel_h 4y agoThat's really interesting. I'll take a deeper look at their pricing - thank you!