3 ms·

very little right now, this study is a pebble needed in the mountain of evidence required. Maybe in 2055 our scientific tools will be more advanced/sensitive to

very little right now, this study is a pebble needed in the mountain of evidence required. Maybe in 2055 our scientific tools will be more advanced/sensitive to measure this stuff.

daniel-cussen 4y ago
That tech is here. Protein folding is sensitive to much lower than ionizing frequencies.
- linux2647 4y ago
  Source?
  - ramesh31 4y ago
    Interested as well
  - capitainenemo 4y ago
    This came up several times on HN and I've been curious about it ever since, esp the opinion of researchers. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21457072 http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21457072 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Blank+M&cauthor_id=21457072 https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=Blank+M&cauthor_id=214... https://www.physiology.columbia.edu/MartinBlank.html https://www.physiology.columbia.edu/MartinBlank.html This professor, now retired, did a number of papers on this theory claiming to find evidence of sensitivity.