3 ms·
So if I understand you right, Namibia lacks the "trappings of what present-day humans think of as civilization" because many San live as hunter-gatherers? The
by eesmith 5y ago
So if I understand you right, Namibia lacks the "trappings of what present-day humans think of as civilization" because many San live as hunter-gatherers?
The link you gave describes people who live on the margin; "peripheral members of the Puebloan culture". Not "most of the native groups", which is the phrase yous used earlier.
Yes, many modern people don't have a sense of the pre-Spanish history of the Southwest. How is their ignorance relevant?
> Artifacts are not history
PaulDavisThe1st wrote "I suspect that the Tewa/Pueblo people in general would be a little troubled by the idea that they "left almost no history" behind."
The current buildings of Taos Pueblo, as an example, started about 1,000 years ago. And they have a detailed oral history.
This history helps understand the physical evidence. I'll quote from https://orias.berkeley.edu/resources-teachers/societies-americas/ancestral-pueblo https://orias.berkeley.edu/resources-teachers/societies-amer... :
] Consultation and collaboration with Pueblo people and scholars has changed the way that archaeologists think about migration away from Mesa Verde. Now, based on Tewa oral history, researchers understand that Mesa Verde people simply moved farther east, towards the Rio Grande region of northern New Mexico, where many of their descendants still live today. Using oral history, archaeology, and soil science, archaeologists have been able to come up with new ideas about the end of Mesa Verde. Even though there was a drought at the end of the time that people lived at the site, we can see that the environment was only one of the things that led people to move. The conditions when people moved weren’t much worse than they had been before.
(Emphasis mine.)
> everything died so we traveled through the hellish lands of death until we reached a place with water
What are you talking about? Here are stores from the Cochiti - https://www.sacred-texts.com/nam/sw/tci/index.htm https://www.sacred-texts.com/nam/sw/tci/index.htm . I couldn't find something like what what you described.
Or, "The oldest tradition of the people of Acoma and Laguna indicates that they lived on some island; that their homes were destroyed by tidal waves, earthquakes, and red-hot stones from the sky. They fled and landed on a low, swampy coast. From here they migrated to the northwest, and wherever they made a long stay they built a "White City" (Kush-kut-ret)" - http://www.legendsofnativeamerica.com/region_southwest/legends/CreationofSummerandWinter.php http://www.legendsofnativeamerica.com/region_southwest/legen... .
In that story, things died because it was too cold, until Summer and Winter came to an agreement.
And as I quoted earlier, "The conditions when people moved weren’t much worse than they had been before."
- PaulDavisThe1st 5y agoto be fair to t-3, they seem to have some real focus on the Chihuahan and Sonoran deserts, and I suspect that things may indeed have been a little different there than the areas occupied by the Tewa/Pueblo peoples and even the Hopi.
- eesmith 5y agoI think you're being generous. "American west" covers a lot of area. The idea that the people there 'lacked resources for widespread access to fire' is preposterous. And t-3's own example shows the Jumanos 'developed a high skill in tanning buffalo and deer hides from which they made clothing and moccasins', the and the Mansos women 'cover themselves from the waist down with two deerskins', so definitely with access to resources from which to make clothing. That they didn't is a different thing.
- ncmncm 5y agoThe only recent human population that lacked fire was the Tasmanians. They of course had fire when Tasmania was still connected to Australia, but lost the secret, probably in some catastrophe that wiped out hereditary fire-keepers. Tasmanians were almost exterminated by British occupiers conducting safaris.