3 ms·
The OP is very negative in tone[1], although curious. I think the person you’re responding to provided a solid answer to OP’s question, whilst imbuing their ans
by jrh206 4y ago
The OP is very negative in tone[1], although curious. I think the person you’re responding to provided a solid answer to OP’s question, whilst imbuing their answer with a reasonable response to OP’s tone.
[1] "(badly)", "always some startup with no good will", "Electron" (arguably), "filled it full of always-online trackers"
- jen20 4y agoIt’s not negative to state the facts - all of those things are true.
- jrh206 4y agoThe point is that you can choose which facts to present. In any case, “(badly)” is clearly an opinion and not a fact.
- altcognito 4y agoAlso no good will is also an opinion.
- Brian_K_White 4y agoI missed the memo announcing those are illegal.
- altcognito 4y agoNot at all, but it isn’t a fact
- abdulmuhaimin 4y agoI think you need to define what your definition of "fact" is, because it clearly deviates from how "fact" is normally used. No, those are not facts
- Brian_K_White 4y agonegative in tone? so what? I already acknowledged the critical opinion. that much is allowed.