5 ms·
It's your choice to read that question as either curiosity or complaint. I don't see anything in the question that exactly says "get this crap off my screen" "
by Brian_K_White 5y ago
It's your choice to read that question as either curiosity or complaint.
I don't see anything in the question that exactly says "get this crap off my screen" "these companies should not be allowed to exist". I see a critical opinion but that is entirely allowed. Your critical opinion like the one you just wrote is presumably allowed.
But I do see an observance of phenomenon, and I find any phenomenon interesting.
This post is a perfectly valid question, just at it's academic face value.
- jrh206 5y agoThe OP is very negative in tone[1], although curious. I think the person you’re responding to provided a solid answer to OP’s question, whilst imbuing their answer with a reasonable response to OP’s tone. [1] "(badly)", "always some startup with no good will", "Electron" (arguably), "filled it full of always-online trackers"
- jen20 5y agoIt’s not negative to state the facts - all of those things are true.
- jrh206 5y agoThe point is that you can choose which facts to present. In any case, “(badly)” is clearly an opinion and not a fact.
- altcognito 5y agoAlso no good will is also an opinion.
- Brian_K_White 5y agoI missed the memo announcing those are illegal.
- altcognito 5y agoNot at all, but it isn’t a fact
- abdulmuhaimin 5y agoI think you need to define what your definition of "fact" is, because it clearly deviates from how "fact" is normally used. No, those are not facts
- Brian_K_White 5y agonegative in tone? so what? I already acknowledged the critical opinion. that much is allowed.