3 ms·
Wouldn’t that leader still end up with a personal phone that isn’t that secured ? Or at the other end of spectrum have a work device that is so special that it’
by makeitdouble 4y ago
Wouldn’t that leader still end up with a personal phone that isn’t that secured ? Or at the other end of spectrum have a work device that is so special that it’s extremely identifiable and targetable ?
What we have now for work devices with manageable profiles seems to me to be a good balance that should possible to harden enough for extreme cases as well.
- true_religion 4y agoNah not really. Having a top-end iPhone or Samsung be a hardened device by default would mean world leaders would be protected on their personal devices. Also, most anyone who talks to a world leader would get that same protection. On the other hand "run of the mill" phones that you can hand to a teenager (or use as a backup phone) don't need ultra-security and the cost that comes with it. Really low end devices would probably be secure by simple virtue of not having enough features to enable hacking.